GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
VS
GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

2013Core: 797 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank 66 and the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is on rank 385, so the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
98%
#22
Radeon RX 7700
MSRP: $449|Avg: $399
94%
#56
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
207%
#58
188%
#59
188%
#63
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
171%
#64
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
169%
#66
100%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#78
Radeon HD 8970M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

#375
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1241%
#377
1125%
#378
1122%
#382
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1020%
#383
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1013%
#385
100%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
100%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
99%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
99%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
98%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
98%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
97%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
97%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
96%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
96%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
95%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
95%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
93%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,925 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 797 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,927 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design scores 3,925 and the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition reaches 3,927 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition). Raw compute: 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 2.142 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
G3D Mark Score
3,925
3,927
Architecture
Pascal
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
1344+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.177 TFLOPS+2%
2.142 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
48
112+133%
L1 Cache
288 KB+157%
112 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition) — the GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
80 GB/s
160 GB/s+100%
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
TDP
75W-25%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
52.3+33%
39.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Codename
GP107
GK104
Release
January 3 2018
November 8 2013
Ranking
#429
#803