
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅95.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2019Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2019Why buy it
- ✅95.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1060: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 180W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌500% higher power demand at 180W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 51 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1125 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,314 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 6,314 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 59.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1125 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+59% | 6,314 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+285% | 2.304 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+54% | 1125 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1 MB+6% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — a 71.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+71% | 112 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (11_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q's 30W — a 142.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 30W-83% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 210.5+277% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #383 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













