
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅5.1% more average FPS across 17 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 235mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅+18.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 18.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 17 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌35.8% longer card at 235mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅5.1% more average FPS across 17 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 235mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+18.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 18.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 11,892).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 17 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌35.8% longer card at 235mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 18.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 11,892+18% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1755 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.5 MB+166% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 32.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 130W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-11% | 450W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 91.5+64% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 18.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 47.8+18% |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













