G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro K2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro K2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

✅222.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $251 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 464.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Quadro K2200 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌164.7% higher power demand at 180W vs 68W.

Quadro K2200

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 68W instead of 180W, a 112W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100.8% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 222.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 181.1% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 3,580), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $251 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 464.5% (40.4 vs 7.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro K2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro K2200

The Quadro K2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,580 points. Launch price was $395.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro K2200's 3,580 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 181.1%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro K2200 uses Maxwell, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 640 (Quadro K2200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (Quadro K2200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro K2200
G3D Mark Score	10,064+181%	3,580
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Process Node	16 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2560+300%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.873 TFLOPS+517%	1.439 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+54%	1124 MHz
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	160+300%	40
L1 Cache	960 KB+200%	320 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro K2200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2200 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2200.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro K2200
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro K2200
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 4th Gen (Quadro K2200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2200).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro K2200
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	NVENC 4th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC (Pascal)	NVDEC 1
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro K2200's 68W — a 90.3% difference. The Quadro K2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro K2200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 203mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro K2200
TDP	180W	68W-62%
Recommended PSU	400W	350W-13%
Power Connector	6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	203mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	55.9+6%	52.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro K2200 launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 50.2% cheaper ($251 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 7.2 (Quadro K2200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 461.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1060	Quadro K2200
MSRP	$249-50%	$500
Performance per Dollar	40.4+461%	7.2
Codename	GP104	GM107
Release	May 27 2016	July 22 2014
Ranking	#137	#534

Search GeForce GTX 1060 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.