GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P2000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

2017Core: 1076 MHzBoost: 1480 MHz
Similar parts
···

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P2000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • 84.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $176 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
  • Delivers 146.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
  • 20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 5 GB).
  • Measures 173mm instead of 201mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 5 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 70.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $425 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 84.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 44.5% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 6,964), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 5 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $176 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $425, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 146.7% (40.4 vs 16.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Quadro P2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P2000's 6,964 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 44.5%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P2000
G3D Mark Score
10,064+45%
6,964
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
16 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2560+150%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+193%
3.031 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+17%
1480 MHz
ROPs
64+60%
40
TMUs
160+150%
64
L1 Cache
960 KB+150%
384 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P2000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 carries 5 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 20% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 256-bit on the Quadro P2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P2000
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+20%
5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB+60%
1.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P2000
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P2000
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 6.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P2000
TDP
180W
75W-58%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
201mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Perf/Watt
55.9
92.9+66%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 41.4% cheaper ($176 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 16.4 (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 146.3% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P2000 (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Quadro P2000
MSRP
$249-41%
$425
Performance per Dollar
40.4+146%
16.4
Codename
GP104
GP106
Release
May 27 2016
February 6 2017
Ranking
#137
#346

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.