
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+88% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P2000 Max-Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P2000 Max-Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,353 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2017Why buy it
- ✅+88% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P2000 Max-Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P2000 Max-Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 180W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌125% higher power demand at 180W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,353 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro P2000 Max-Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P2000 Max-Q make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P2000 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 5,353 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 88%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+88% | 5,353 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+18% | 1468 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 80W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 66.9+20% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P2000 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GP107GL |
| Release | May 27 2016 | July 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #426 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













