
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅36.6% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1022.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅36.6% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1022.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌903.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro P5000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro P5000 (móvel) make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro P5000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 9,000 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 11.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+12% | 9,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+37% | 6.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+10% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+30% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 90.0+61% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 90% less ($2250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.6 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1022.2% better value. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-90% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1022% | 3.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #137 | #235 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













