
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 180W vs 60W.
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 180W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅11.7% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 180W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 180W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 91 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,119 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 8,119 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 24%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.599 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+24% | 8,119 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+58% | 5.599 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+43% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160+11% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.3 MB+145% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1060 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 7th Gen (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design's 60W — a 100% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 60W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | Unknown |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 135.3+142% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Quadro RTX 3000 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | TU106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #137 | #313 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













