
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 573.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,000).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅+19.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon PRO V710
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 573.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+19.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,000).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌703.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO V710 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 56 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 87 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 135 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 135 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon PRO V710

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon PRO V710's 12,000 — the Radeon PRO V710 leads by 19.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064 | 12,000+19% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3456+35% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 27.65 TFLOPS+212% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2000 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 216+35% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO V710 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO V710 has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO V710 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO V710's 158W — a 13% difference. The Radeon PRO V710 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO V710). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 158W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 75.9+36% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 87.5% less ($1751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 573.3% better value. The Radeon PRO V710 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon PRO V710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-88% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+573% | 6.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 32 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | October 3 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #196 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













