GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 220.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Draws 180W instead of 230W, a 50W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 267mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 8200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

  • 10.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
  • GeForce GTX 1060 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 301.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 27.8% higher power demand at 230W vs 180W.
  • 54.3% longer card at 267mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 25.3% in PassMark G3D (12,615 vs 10,064), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro WX 8200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 16nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $750 cheaper on MSRP at $249 vs $999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 220.1% (40.4 vs 12.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1060 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro WX 8200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 12,615 — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 leads by 25.3%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score
10,064
12,615+25%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 5.0
Process Node
16 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2560
3584+40%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS
10.75 TFLOPS+21%
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+16%
1500 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
224+40%
L1 Cache
960 KB+7%
896 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 8200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 8200 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 8200. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon Pro WX 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX
12
12.1
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 7.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro WX 8200
TDP
180W-22%
230W
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+2%
54.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1060 was 75.1% cheaper ($750 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 220.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 8200 (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon Pro WX 8200
MSRP
$249-75%
$999
Performance per Dollar
40.4+221%
12.6
Codename
GP104
Vega 10
Release
May 27 2016
August 13 2018
Ranking
#137
#210

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.