GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 285

2014Core: 918 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +50.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 50.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Measures 173mm instead of 221mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon R9 285

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,680 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 27.7% longer card at 221mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 285?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 50.7% higher PassMark G3D performance and 6 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2014, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014, 50.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is in basically the same MSRP band at $249 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 50.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 50.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon R9 285 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon R9 285 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $249 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
1080p
low117 FPS81 FPS
medium105 FPS69 FPS
high91 FPS57 FPS
ultra77 FPS37 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS71 FPS
medium87 FPS62 FPS
high76 FPS45 FPS
ultra67 FPS29 FPS
4K
low55 FPS26 FPS
medium49 FPS24 FPS
high41 FPS16 FPS
ultra37 FPS14 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
1080p
low216 FPS129 FPS
medium181 FPS98 FPS
high148 FPS78 FPS
ultra113 FPS52 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS73 FPS
medium107 FPS53 FPS
high87 FPS39 FPS
ultra68 FPS27 FPS
4K
low62 FPS27 FPS
medium51 FPS19 FPS
high49 FPS15 FPS
ultra41 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
1080p
low453 FPS301 FPS
medium362 FPS240 FPS
high302 FPS200 FPS
ultra226 FPS150 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS225 FPS
medium272 FPS180 FPS
high226 FPS150 FPS
ultra170 FPS113 FPS
4K
low226 FPS150 FPS
medium181 FPS120 FPS
high151 FPS100 FPS
ultra113 FPS75 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
1080p
low358 FPS173 FPS
medium302 FPS142 FPS
high260 FPS125 FPS
ultra226 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS123 FPS
medium254 FPS103 FPS
high208 FPS91 FPS
ultra170 FPS67 FPS
4K
low170 FPS72 FPS
medium133 FPS56 FPS
high123 FPS45 FPS
ultra102 FPS31 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 285

The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 285's 6,680 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 50.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
G3D Mark Score
10,064+51%
6,680
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560+43%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+170%
3.29 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
160+43%
112
L1 Cache
960 KB+114%
448 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 285 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) — a 9.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s+9%
176 GB/s
Bus Width
192-bit
256-bit+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.5+2%
4.4
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 5.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 5.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
TDP
180W-5%
190W
Recommended PSU
400W-20%
500W
Power Connector
6-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
173mm
221mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+59%
35.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 285 launched at $249. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 285
MSRP
$249
$249
Performance per Dollar
40.4+51%
26.8
Codename
GP104
Tonga
Release
May 27 2016
September 2 2014
Ranking
#137
#365