
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 285
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+50.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 50.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 221mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon R9 285
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,680 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌27.7% longer card at 221mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R9 285
2014Why buy it
- ✅+50.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 50.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 221mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,680 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌27.7% longer card at 221mm vs 173mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 285?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 285 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 285

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 285
Radeon R9 285
The Radeon R9 285 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,680 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 285's 6,680 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 50.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 285 uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+51% | 6,680 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+43% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+170% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+43% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+114% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 285 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285) — a 9.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+9% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 285). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.5+2% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Radeon R9 285).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 5.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 285's 190W — a 5.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-5% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 173mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 109mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+59% | 35.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 285 launched at $249. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 26.8 (Radeon R9 285) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+51% | 26.8 |
| Codename | GP104 | Tonga |
| Release | May 27 2016 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #137 | #365 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













