GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon R9 290X

2013Boost: 947 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +19.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Costs $300 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • Delivers 163.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 180W instead of 350W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Radeon R9 290X

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,426 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 120.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $549 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 290X?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 10,064 vs 8,426 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 1060 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (180W vs 350W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2013, 19.4% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is about $300 cheaper on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $549 MSRP, and you are getting 19.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 163.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Radeon R9 290X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon R9 290X is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $549 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
1080p
low117 FPS103 FPS
medium105 FPS89 FPS
high91 FPS72 FPS
ultra77 FPS43 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS90 FPS
medium87 FPS79 FPS
high76 FPS57 FPS
ultra67 FPS33 FPS
4K
low55 FPS28 FPS
medium49 FPS27 FPS
high41 FPS18 FPS
ultra37 FPS15 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
1080p
low216 FPS197 FPS
medium181 FPS168 FPS
high148 FPS134 FPS
ultra113 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS134 FPS
medium107 FPS104 FPS
high87 FPS82 FPS
ultra68 FPS62 FPS
4K
low62 FPS61 FPS
medium51 FPS49 FPS
high49 FPS44 FPS
ultra41 FPS35 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
1080p
low453 FPS379 FPS
medium362 FPS303 FPS
high302 FPS253 FPS
ultra226 FPS190 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS284 FPS
medium272 FPS228 FPS
high226 FPS190 FPS
ultra170 FPS142 FPS
4K
low226 FPS190 FPS
medium181 FPS152 FPS
high151 FPS126 FPS
ultra113 FPS95 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
1080p
low358 FPS155 FPS
medium302 FPS128 FPS
high260 FPS110 FPS
ultra226 FPS94 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS110 FPS
medium254 FPS91 FPS
high208 FPS79 FPS
ultra170 FPS65 FPS
4K
low170 FPS66 FPS
medium133 FPS52 FPS
high123 FPS41 FPS
ultra102 FPS31 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 290X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 290X

The Radeon R9 290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 24 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 947 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 350W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,426 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 290X's 8,426 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 19.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 290X uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 290X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.632 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 290X). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 947 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
G3D Mark Score
10,064+19%
8,426
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2560
2816+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+58%
5.632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+83%
947 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
160
176+10%
L1 Cache
960 KB+36%
704 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 290X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 290X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon R9 290X) — a 66.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 290X. Bus width: 192-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
320 GB/s+67%
Bus Width
192-bit
512-bit+167%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
DirectX
12
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 290X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 290X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 2.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
UVD 4.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 290X's 350W — a 64.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 750W (Radeon R9 290X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 275mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
TDP
180W-49%
350W
Recommended PSU
400W-47%
750W
Power Connector
6-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
173mm
275mm
Height
111mm
109mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
95°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+132%
24.1
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 290X launched at $549. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 54.6% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 15.3 (Radeon R9 290X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 164.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Radeon R9 290X
MSRP
$249-55%
$549
Performance per Dollar
40.4+164%
15.3
Codename
GP104
Hawaii
Release
May 27 2016
October 24 2013
Ranking
#137
#342