
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M295X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+95.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M295X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M295X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,150 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon R9 M295X
2014Why buy it
- ✅+95.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 M295X: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 M295X is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 173mm, a 172mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌17200% longer card at 173mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,150 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌20.5% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.2 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon R9 M295X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M295X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 58 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon R9 M295X

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 5,150 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 95.4%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+95% | 5,150 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+200% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+88% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M295X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M295X has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 9.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+9% | 176 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 32.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 173mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-28% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 173mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+171% | 20.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 M295X launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 17% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 17.2 (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 134.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon R9 M295X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+135% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GP104 | Amethyst |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #137 | #437 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













