GeForce GTX 1060 vs RTX A400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX A400

2024Core: 727 MHzBoost: 1762 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +68.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 84.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $249 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
  • 260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $114 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than RTX A400?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 5,983 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while RTX A400 is a 2024 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A400 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 8nm process instead of 16nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1060 is about 84.4% more expensive on MSRP at $249 MSRP versus $135 MSRP, and you are getting 68.2% higher G3D Mark. RTX A400 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does RTX A400 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Yes. RTX A400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 180W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $135 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1060. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1060 currently gives you 68.2% higher G3D Mark. RTX A400 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
1080p
low117 FPS45 FPS
medium105 FPS31 FPS
high91 FPS23 FPS
ultra77 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS36 FPS
medium87 FPS22 FPS
high76 FPS12 FPS
ultra67 FPS6 FPS
4K
low55 FPS11 FPS
medium49 FPS8 FPS
high41 FPS5 FPS
ultra37 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
1080p
low216 FPS73 FPS
medium181 FPS48 FPS
high148 FPS32 FPS
ultra113 FPS22 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS46 FPS
medium107 FPS25 FPS
high87 FPS19 FPS
ultra68 FPS14 FPS
4K
low62 FPS23 FPS
medium51 FPS14 FPS
high49 FPS11 FPS
ultra41 FPS8 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
1080p
low453 FPS269 FPS
medium362 FPS215 FPS
high302 FPS179 FPS
ultra226 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS202 FPS
medium272 FPS162 FPS
high226 FPS135 FPS
ultra170 FPS101 FPS
4K
low226 FPS135 FPS
medium181 FPS108 FPS
high151 FPS90 FPS
ultra113 FPS67 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
1080p
low358 FPS147 FPS
medium302 FPS117 FPS
high260 FPS99 FPS
ultra226 FPS79 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS108 FPS
medium254 FPS87 FPS
high208 FPS74 FPS
ultra170 FPS58 FPS
4K
low170 FPS63 FPS
medium133 FPS50 FPS
high123 FPS40 FPS
ultra102 FPS29 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A400

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 68.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1762 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
G3D Mark Score
10,064+68%
5,983
Architecture
Pascal
Ampere
Process Node
16 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2560+233%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+228%
2.706 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1762 MHz+2%
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
160+567%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 113% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
TDP
180W
50W-72%
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
55.9
119.7+114%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. The RTX A400 costs 45.8% less ($114 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 9.7% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060RTX A400
MSRP
$249
$135-46%
Performance per Dollar
40.4
44.3+10%
Codename
GP104
GA107
Release
May 27 2016
April 16 2024
Ranking
#137
#397