
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+68.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌84.4% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅+68.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌84.4% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
- ❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,983 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than RTX A400?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A400 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and RTX A400

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A400
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the RTX A400's 5,983 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 68.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1762 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+68% | 5,983 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+233% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+228% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1762 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+567% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A400 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 113% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 119.7+114% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. The RTX A400 costs 45.8% less ($114 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 9.7% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $135-46% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4 | 44.3+10% |
| Codename | GP104 | GA107 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #137 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













