Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla C2075

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
GTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

2011Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla C2075 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1060
6 GB 180
10,064
+233.6%
brand logoGeForce GTX 680
brand logoGeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
brand logoGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce GTX TITAN Z
brand logoGeForce GTX 980 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Tesla C2075
2 GB 247
3,017
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 480M
brand logoGeForce GTX 460 v2
brand logoGeForce MX330
brand logoGeForce GTX 465
brand logoGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
brand logoRTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla C2075: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • ✅+233.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅Tesla C2075 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1060 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 180W instead of 247W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2016 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Tesla C2075

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,017 vs 10,064).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • ❌37.2% higher power demand at 247W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 233.6% in PassMark G3D (10,064 vs 3,017), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 16nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1060 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla C2075 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla C2075's 3,017 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 233.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
G3D Mark Score
10,064+234%
3,017
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2560+471%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+763%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
160+186%
56
L1 Cache
960 KB+7%
896 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla C2075 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 1060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1060 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2075. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
—
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
—
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 31.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
TDP
180W-27%
247W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
—
Height
111mm
—
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
—
85°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+358%
12.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1060 came in at $249, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. On MSRP, Tesla C2075 was 100+% cheaper ($249 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1060 (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
MSRP
$249
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
40.4
Infinity
Codename
GP104
GF110
Release
May 27 2016
July 25 2011
Ranking
#137
#553
Search GeForce GTX 1060 on AmazonSearch Tesla C2075 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.