GeForce GTX 1060 vs Tesla C2075

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

2011Core: 574 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060

2016

Why buy it

  • +233.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Less risky long-term buy than Tesla C2075: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla C2075 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
  • Draws 180W instead of 247W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Tesla C2075

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,017 vs 10,064).
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
  • 37.2% higher power demand at 247W vs 180W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Tesla C2075?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 10,064 vs 3,017 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1060 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Tesla C2075 is a 2011 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011, 233.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 2 GB, and a 16nm process instead of 40nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 1060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 233.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.
Is Tesla C2075 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Tesla C2075 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
1080p
low117 FPS82 FPS
medium105 FPS68 FPS
high91 FPS48 FPS
ultra77 FPS30 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS64 FPS
medium87 FPS53 FPS
high76 FPS34 FPS
ultra67 FPS21 FPS
4K
low55 FPS24 FPS
medium49 FPS22 FPS
high41 FPS14 FPS
ultra37 FPS12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
1080p
low216 FPS120 FPS
medium181 FPS92 FPS
high148 FPS73 FPS
ultra113 FPS56 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS79 FPS
medium107 FPS55 FPS
high87 FPS40 FPS
ultra68 FPS32 FPS
4K
low62 FPS36 FPS
medium51 FPS26 FPS
high49 FPS23 FPS
ultra41 FPS18 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
1080p
low453 FPS136 FPS
medium362 FPS109 FPS
high302 FPS91 FPS
ultra226 FPS68 FPS
1440p
low340 FPS102 FPS
medium272 FPS81 FPS
high226 FPS68 FPS
ultra170 FPS51 FPS
4K
low226 FPS68 FPS
medium181 FPS54 FPS
high151 FPS45 FPS
ultra113 FPS34 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
1080p
low358 FPS136 FPS
medium302 FPS109 FPS
high260 FPS91 FPS
ultra226 FPS68 FPS
1440p
low299 FPS102 FPS
medium254 FPS81 FPS
high208 FPS68 FPS
ultra170 FPS51 FPS
4K
low170 FPS68 FPS
medium133 FPS54 FPS
high123 FPS43 FPS
ultra102 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla C2075

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla C2075's 3,017 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 233.6%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla C2075 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 448 (Tesla C2075). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2075).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
G3D Mark Score
10,064+234%
3,017
Architecture
Pascal
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2560+471%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.873 TFLOPS+763%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
160+186%
56
L1 Cache
960 KB+7%
896 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla C2075 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2075 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2075) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2075). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
DirectX
12
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Tesla C2075).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla C2075's 247W — a 31.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Tesla C2075). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
TDP
180W-27%
247W
Recommended PSU
400W
350W-13%
Power Connector
6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
173mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
55.9+358%
12.2
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla C2075 launched at $0. The Tesla C2075 costs 100+% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs Infinity (Tesla C2075) — the Tesla C2075 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060Tesla C2075
MSRP
$249
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
40.4
Infinity
Codename
GP104
GF110
Release
May 27 2016
July 25 2011
Ranking
#137
#553