
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla K40m
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+220.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla K40m: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla K40m is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 245W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla K40m
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,143 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌36.1% higher power demand at 245W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla K40m
2013Why buy it
- ✅+220.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla K40m: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla K40m is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 245W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,143 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌36.1% higher power demand at 245W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Tesla K40m?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla K40m still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla K40m

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla K40m
Tesla K40m
The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla K40m's 3,143 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 220.2%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla K40m uses Kepler, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40m). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+220% | 3,143 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2880+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+76% | 5.046 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+98% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 160 | 240+50% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+300% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla K40m relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40m has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla K40m's 245W — a 30.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Tesla K40m). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-27% | 245W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+337% | 12.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla K40m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | GK110B |
| Release | May 27 2016 | November 22 2013 |
| Ranking | #137 | #573 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













