
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla M60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+43.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1631.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,002 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1104.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla M60
2015Why buy it
- ✅+43.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1631.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,002 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1104.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Tesla M60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla M60

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla M60
Tesla M60
The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla M60's 7,002 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 43.7%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+44% | 7,002 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+25% | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+84% | 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+47% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160+25% | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+25% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M60 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-40% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W | 350W-13% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9+140% | 23.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 91.7% less ($2751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1656.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla M60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-92% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+1657% | 2.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | GM204 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #137 | #355 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













