
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+11.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 348.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 173mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,004 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+11.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $751 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 348.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 180W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 173mm, a 5mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 180W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,004 vs 10,064).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Tesla P4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla P4 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Tesla P4

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Tesla P4
Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 versus the Tesla P4's 9,004 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 11.8%. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+12% | 9,004 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+56% | 5.704 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+56% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB | 960 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla P4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P4 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 82.4% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 75W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 120.1+115% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 75.1% less ($751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 9.0 (Tesla P4) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 348.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-75% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+349% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #137 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













