GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
VS
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

2017Core: 1215 MHzBoost: 1379 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1708 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank #8 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

#6
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
110%
#8
100%
#9
100%
#13
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
91%
#14
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
90%
#18
Radeon RX 560X (móvel)
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (8 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB.

InsightGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+166.7%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
Standard Size (250mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 199.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+199.2%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1379 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,842 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design scores 9,842 and the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB reaches 9,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Raw compute: 5.648 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Boost clocks: 1379 MHz vs 1708 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
G3D Mark Score
9,842
9,815
Architecture
Pascal
Pascal
Process Node
16 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2048+78%
1152
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.648 TFLOPS+44%
3.935 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1379 MHz
1708 MHz+24%
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
128+78%
72
L1 Cache
768 KB+78%
432 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+167%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s+33%
192 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+33%
192-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Encoder
NVENC 4.0
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB's 120W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 250mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
TDP
115W-4%
120W
Recommended PSU
500W
400W-20%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
0mm
250mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
85.6+5%
81.8
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.6 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 196.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 199.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q DesignGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
MSRP
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$150
$50-67%
Performance per Dollar
65.6
196.3+199%
Codename
GP104
GP106
Release
June 27 2017
August 18 2016
Ranking
#358
#272