
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank #8 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (8 GB vs 3 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 199.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+199.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1379 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,842 points.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design scores 9,842 and the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB reaches 9,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Raw compute: 5.648 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Boost clocks: 1379 MHz vs 1708 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,842 | 9,815 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+78% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.648 TFLOPS+44% | 3.935 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1379 MHz | 1708 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128+78% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+78% | 432 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+167% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+33% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB's 120W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 250mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-4% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 250mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 85.6+5% | 81.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.6 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 196.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 199.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $50-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.6 | 196.3+199% |
| Codename | GP104 | GP106 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #358 | #272 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















