
GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank #8 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $150), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 136% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+136%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design and GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1379 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,842 points.

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,063 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design scores 9,842 and the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB reaches 10,063 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Raw compute: 5.648 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Boost clocks: 1379 MHz vs 1709 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,842 | 10,063+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.648 TFLOPS+29% | 4.375 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1379 MHz | 1709 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+60% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) — the GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+33% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design draws 115W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB's 120W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 250mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-4% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 250mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 85.6+2% | 83.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB costs 56.7% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 65.6 (GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design) vs 154.8 (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers 136% better value. The GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $65-57% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.6 | 154.8+136% |
| Codename | GP104 | GP106 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | July 19 2016 |
| Ranking | #358 | #255 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















