Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs GRID P40-3Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
GTX family
····
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P40-3Q

2013Core: 745 MHz
Similar parts
·
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs GRID P40-3Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
4 GB 50
6,574
+0.1%
brand logoGeForce GTX 765M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
GRID P40-3Q
4 GB 225
6,570
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 765M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs GRID P40-3Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅GRID P40-3Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

GRID P40-3Q

2013

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (6,574 vs 6,570), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-3Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-3Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs GRID P40-3Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-3Q

The GRID P40-3Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,570 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 6,574 and the GRID P40-3Q reaches 6,570 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GRID P40-3Q uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-3Q). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-3Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignGRID P40-3Q
G3D Mark Score
6,574
6,570
Architecture
Turing
Kepler
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
1536+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS+7%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-3Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignGRID P40-3Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the GRID P40-3Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 0.5 MB (GRID P40-3Q) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignGRID P40-3Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (11_0) (GRID P40-3Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignGRID P40-3Q
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs Tesla NVENC x24 (GRID P40-3Q). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs Tesla NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-3Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignGRID P40-3Q
Encoder
NVENC (Turing)
Tesla NVENC x24
Decoder
NVDEC (4th Gen)
Tesla NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the GRID P40-3Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (GRID P40-3Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignGRID P40-3Q
TDP
50W-78%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
—
267mm
Height
—
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
131.5+350%
29.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignGRID P40-3Q
MSRP
—
$5699
Codename
TU117
GK104
Release
April 2 2020
June 28 2013
Ranking
#371
#628
Search GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design on AmazonSearch GRID P40-3Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.