GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
VS
Quadro T2000 Max-Q

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019Core: 1200 MHzBoost: 1620 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is positioned at rank 160 and the Quadro T2000 Max-Q is on rank 2, so the Quadro T2000 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

#42
Radeon RX 6600S
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
98%
#43
Radeon RX 8060S
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#47
Radeon RX 6700S
MSRP: $479|Avg: $300
95%
#150
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
329%
#152
298%
#153
297%
#157
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
270%
#158
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
268%
#160
100%
#172
GeForce GT 540M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 Max-Q

#1
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
127%
#2
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design.

InsightGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignQuadro T2000 Max-Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%)
Leading raw performance (+5.9%)
Longevity
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro T2000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design and Quadro T2000 Max-Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 6,574 versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 6,959 — the Quadro T2000 Max-Q leads by 5.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignQuadro T2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
6,574
6,959+6%
Architecture
Turing
Turing
Process Node
12 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS
3.318 TFLOPS+35%
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1620 MHz+35%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L1 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignQuadro T2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignQuadro T2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignQuadro T2000 Max-Q
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignQuadro T2000 Max-Q
Encoder
NVENC (Turing)
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
NVDEC (4th Gen)
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignQuadro T2000 Max-Q
TDP
50W
40W-20%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
131.5
174.0+32%