Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs P106-100

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020Core: 1035 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
GTX family
····
Buy on Amazon
VS

P106-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Similar parts
·
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs P106-100 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
4 GB 50
6,574
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 765M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
P106-100
4 GB 75
6,628
+0.8%
brand logoGeForce GTX 765M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 660 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs P106-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅P106-100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
P106-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (6,628 vs 6,574), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P106-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P106-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs P106-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

NVIDIA

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 6,574 and the P106-100 reaches 6,628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignP106-100
G3D Mark Score
6,574
6,628
Architecture
Turing
Pascal
Process Node
12 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1024
1920+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS
6.655 TFLOPS+171%
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1733 MHz+44%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
120+88%
L1 Cache
1 MB+43%
0.7 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The P106-100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignP106-100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design and 128-bit on the P106-100. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignP106-100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignP106-100
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignP106-100
Encoder
NVENC (Turing)
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC (4th Gen)
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit
—
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignP106-100
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
—
250mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
—
Perf/Watt
131.5+49%
88.4
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q DesignP106-100
MSRP
—
$224
Codename
TU117
GP104
Release
April 2 2020
December 12 2017
Ranking
#371
#529
Search GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design on AmazonSearch P106-100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.