GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q...

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014

Why buy it

✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌62% higher power demand at 81W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 81W, a 31W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (6,707 vs 6,574), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 6,574 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	6,707+2%	6,574
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1280+25%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.657 TFLOPS+8%	2.458 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1200 MHz+16%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L1 Cache	0.47 MB	1 MB+113%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) — a 60% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	120 GB/s	192 GB/s+60%
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC	NVDEC (4th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 47.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
TDP	81W	50W-38%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	82.8	131.5+59%