GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌62% higher power demand at 81W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅8.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 81W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 8.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.9% in PassMark G3D (6,968 vs 6,707), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) reaches 6,968 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1485 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score	6,707	6,968+4%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1280+25%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.657 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS+14%
Boost Clock	1038 MHz	1485 MHz+43%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L1 Cache	0.47 MB	1 MB+113%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 120 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) — a 6.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile). Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile). L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	120 GB/s	128 GB/s+7%
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Encoder	5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing)
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC	NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 47.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 87.

Feature	GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
TDP	81W	50W-38%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-14%	87
Perf/Watt	82.8	139.4+68%