
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Popular choices:

P106-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is positioned at rank 90 and the P106-100 is on rank 43, so the P106-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
Performance Per Dollar P106-100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P106-100.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and P106-100

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the P106-100 reaches 6,628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,707+1% | 6,628 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1920+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.657 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+150% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | 1733 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 120+50% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 720 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 7.7% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 81W | 75W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 250mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 82.8 | 88.4+7% |
Value Analysis
The P106-100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $224 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $30 |
| Codename | GM204 | GP104 |
| Release | October 7 2014 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #408 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















