GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs P106-100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014Core: 924 MHzBoost: 1038 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS

P106-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Similar parts
·

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs P106-100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs P106-100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (6,707 vs 6,628), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P106-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P106-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE vs P106-100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,707 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.

NVIDIA

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE scores 6,707 and the P106-100 reaches 6,628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEP106-100
G3D Mark Score
6,707+1%
6,628
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1280
1920+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.657 TFLOPS
6.655 TFLOPS+150%
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1733 MHz+67%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
80
120+50%
L1 Cache
480 KB
720 KB+50%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The P106-100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEP106-100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE and 128-bit on the P106-100. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEP106-100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
192-bit+50%
128-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 12_1 (P106-100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEP106-100
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12_1
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 3rd Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEP106-100
Encoder
5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
NVENC 6th Gen
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC
NVDEC 3rd Gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE draws 81W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 7.7% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 970XM FORCE) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEP106-100
TDP
81W
75W-7%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
250mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
82.8
88.4+7%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is P106-100 (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 970XM FORCEP106-100
MSRP
$224
Codename
GM204
GP104
Release
October 7 2014
December 12 2017
Ranking
#408
#529

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.