GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023Core: 1455 MHzBoost: 1755 MHz
RTX family
·····

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 10.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

2023

Why buy it

  • 73.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 101.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 73.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 82.1% in PassMark G3D (14,332 vs 7,869), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GTX 1650 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 12nm, and 20 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $151 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 10.5% (52.8 vs 47.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 14,332 — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile leads by 82.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1755 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
7,869
14,332+82%
Architecture
Turing
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
12 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
896
2560+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.984 TFLOPS
8.986 TFLOPS+201%
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1755 MHz+5%
ROPs
32
48+50%
TMUs
56
80+43%
L1 Cache
0.88 MB
2.5 MB+184%
L2 Cache
1 MB
12 MB+1100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
192 GB/s+50%
Bus Width
128-bit+33%
96-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
12 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Encoder
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
NVDEC 4th gen
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 50W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
300W-40%
500W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
104.9
286.6+173%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 10.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
MSRP
$149-50%
$300
Performance per Dollar
52.8+10%
47.8
Codename
TU117
AD107
Release
April 23 2019
January 3 2023
Ranking
#323
#166

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.