
GeForce GTX 1650

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅73.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌101.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 14,332 — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile leads by 82.1%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 14,332+82% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2560+186% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+201% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1755 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 56 | 80+43% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2.5 MB+184% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 12 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 192 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 12 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 50W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 286.6+173% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 50.3% cheaper ($151 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 10.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+10% | 47.8 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD107 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #323 | #166 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















