G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 MX 460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 MX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅Delivers 236234.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).
✅GeForce4 MX 460 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌38.8% longer card at 229mm vs 165mm.

GeForce4 MX 460

2010

Why buy it

✅Measures 165mm instead of 229mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
20.1% HIGHER MSRP
$179 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 196625% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 4), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $30 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 236234.1% (52.8 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce4 MX 460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce4 MX 460

The GeForce4 MX 460 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 12 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 4 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 196625%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GeForce4 MX 460 uses Fermi, both on 12 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 336 (GeForce4 MX 460). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.9072 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 460).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 460
G3D Mark Score	7,869+196625%	4
Architecture	Turing	Fermi
Process Node	12 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	896+167%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+229%	0.9072 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	56
L1 Cache	896 KB+100%	448 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 460 carries 128 MB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 460. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 460
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+3100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 460). Vulkan: 1.4 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 460
DirectX	12+71%	7.0
Vulkan	1.4	None
OpenGL	4.6+254%	1.3
Max Displays	3+200%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs No (GeForce4 MX 460). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs No.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 460
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	No
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	No
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GeForce4 MX 460's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 460). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 165mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 60°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 460
TDP	75W-53%	160W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	165mm
Height	111mm	100mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	60°C-14%
Perf/Watt	104.9	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the GeForce4 MX 460 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 16.8% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 MX 460) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GeForce4 MX 460
MSRP	$149-17%	$179
Performance per Dollar	52.8	0.0
Codename	TU117	GF104
Release	April 23 2019	July 12 2010
Ranking	#323	#652

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 MX 460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.