GeForce GTX 1650 vs GRID P4-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+48.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1899.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P4-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P4-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,283 vs 7,869).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅+48.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1899.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID P4-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID P4-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,283 vs 7,869).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1242.3% HIGHER MSRP
$2,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than GRID P4-8Q?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 7,869 vs 5,283 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX 1650 is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GRID P4-8Q is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, 48.9% more raw performance headroom, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $1,851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $2,000 MSRP, and you are getting 48.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1899.3%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GRID P4-8Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GRID P4-8Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $2,000 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

GRID P4-8Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID P4-8Q
1080p
low	94 FPS	106 FPS
medium	83 FPS	91 FPS
high	70 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	92 FPS
medium	74 FPS	81 FPS
high	60 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	29 FPS
medium	39 FPS	28 FPS
high	27 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GRID P4-8Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID P4-8Q
1080p
low	136 FPS	150 FPS
medium	113 FPS	118 FPS
high	94 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	112 FPS
medium	62 FPS	86 FPS
high	44 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	62 FPS
medium	27 FPS	48 FPS
high	21 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GRID P4-8Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID P4-8Q
1080p
low	323 FPS	238 FPS
medium	283 FPS	190 FPS
high	205 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	119 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	178 FPS
medium	202 FPS	143 FPS
high	151 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	119 FPS
medium	117 FPS	95 FPS
high	79 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GRID P4-8Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID P4-8Q
1080p
low	261 FPS	184 FPS
medium	211 FPS	150 FPS
high	191 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	132 FPS
medium	158 FPS	111 FPS
high	135 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	77 FPS
medium	74 FPS	60 FPS
high	65 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open GRID P4-8Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and GRID P4-8Q

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the GRID P4-8Q's 5,283 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 48.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID P4-8Q
G3D Mark Score	7,869+49%	5,283
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	1536+71%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS+35%	2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	96+71%
L1 Cache	896 KB+56%	576 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID P4-8Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID P4-8Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-8Q) — the GRID P4-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID P4-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	GRID P4-8Q
TDP	75W-25%	100W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+99%	52.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 92.5% less ($1851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1930.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).