GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro K5200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $2,101 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1832.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
✅Quadro K5200 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro K5200

2014

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
1410.1% HIGHER MSRP
$2,250 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 28% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 6,149), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,101 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $2,250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1832.5% (52.8 vs 2.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro K5200

The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro K5200's 6,149 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 28%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 771 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K5200
G3D Mark Score	7,869+28%	6,149
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	2304+157%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	3.553 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+116%	771 MHz
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	56	192+243%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K5200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 64.8% advantage for the Quadro K5200. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K5200
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	211 GB/s+65%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K5200
TDP	75W-50%	150W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+156%	41.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 93.4% cheaper ($2101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1855.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro K5200
MSRP	$149-93%	$2250
Performance per Dollar	52.8+1856%	2.7
Codename	TU117	GK110B
Release	April 23 2019	July 22 2014
Ranking	#323	#391

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro K5200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.