G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅18.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $276 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 222.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $425 MSRP).
✅Quadro P2000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 5 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌13.9% longer card at 229mm vs 201mm.

Quadro P2000

2017

Why buy it

✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (5 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Measures 201mm instead of 229mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 5 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
185.2% HIGHER MSRP
$425 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($425 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 13% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 6,964), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $276 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $425, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 222.3% (52.8 vs 16.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P2000's 6,964 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 13%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000
G3D Mark Score	7,869+13%	6,964
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	1024+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	3.031 TFLOPS+2%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+13%	1480 MHz
ROPs	32	40+25%
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	896 KB+133%	384 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 carries 5 GB. Quadro P2000 gives you 25% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Quadro P2000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the Quadro P2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	5 GB+25%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB+25%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000
DirectX	12	12.0
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P2000).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	201mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+13%	92.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 64.9% cheaper ($276 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 16.4 (Quadro P2000) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 222% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000
MSRP	$149-65%	$425
Performance per Dollar	52.8+222%	16.4
Codename	TU117	GP106
Release	April 23 2019	February 6 2017
Ranking	#323	#346

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro P2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.