GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅11.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 393.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
235.6% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 47% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5,353), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $351 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 393.3% (52.8 vs 10.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Quadro P2000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 5,353 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 47%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1291 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	7,869+47%	5,353
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	1152+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	2.974 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+29%	1291 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	72+29%
L1 Cache	896 KB+107%	432 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Quadro P2000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.25 MB+25%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+47%	71.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 70.2% cheaper ($351 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 393.5% better value.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP	$149-70%	$500
Performance per Dollar	52.8+393%	10.7
Codename	TU117	GP106
Release	April 23 2019	February 15 2019
Ranking	#323	#399

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Quadro P2000 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.