
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅+47% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 393.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,353 vs 7,869).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌235.6% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Quadro P2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅+47% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 393.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 10.7 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,353 vs 7,869).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌235.6% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Quadro P2000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 41 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro P2000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 5,353 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 47%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1291 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869+47% | 5,353 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1152+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 2.974 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+29% | 1291 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 72+29% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+107% | 432 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P2000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB+25% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9+47% | 71.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 70.2% less ($351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 10.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 393.5% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-70% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.8+393% | 10.7 |
| Codename | TU117 | GP106 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | February 15 2019 |
| Ranking | #323 | #399 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













