G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1366.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P5000 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P5000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P5000 (móvel) across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅16.2% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1577.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,350 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1366.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P5000 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P5000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅16.2% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P5000 (móvel) across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1577.2% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P5000 (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Quadro P5000 (móvel) is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 16.2% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data and 14.4% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2017 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017 and a 12nm process instead of 16nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P5000 (móvel) is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P5000 (móvel) is about 1577.2% more expensive on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 16.2% more estimated average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data and 14.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce GTX 1650 make more sense than Quadro P5000 (móvel)?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P5000 (móvel). The trade-off is that Quadro P5000 (móvel) currently gives you 14.4% higher G3D Mark and 16.2% more estimated average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Quadro P5000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
1080p
low	94 FPS	103 FPS
medium	83 FPS	94 FPS
high	70 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	64 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	91 FPS
medium	74 FPS	80 FPS
high	60 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	41 FPS
medium	39 FPS	38 FPS
high	27 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P5000 (móvel)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
1080p
low	136 FPS	233 FPS
medium	113 FPS	197 FPS
high	94 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	122 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	167 FPS
medium	62 FPS	138 FPS
high	44 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	96 FPS
medium	27 FPS	78 FPS
high	21 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P5000 (móvel)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
1080p
low	323 FPS	405 FPS
medium	283 FPS	324 FPS
high	205 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	202 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	304 FPS
medium	202 FPS	243 FPS
high	151 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	202 FPS
medium	117 FPS	162 FPS
high	79 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	101 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P5000 (móvel)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
1080p
low	261 FPS	227 FPS
medium	211 FPS	181 FPS
high	191 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	130 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	175 FPS
medium	158 FPS	139 FPS
high	135 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	95 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	93 FPS
medium	74 FPS	73 FPS
high	65 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Quadro P5000 (móvel)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Quadro P5000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Quadro P5000 (móvel)

The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 9,000 — the Quadro P5000 (móvel) leads by 14.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1582 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	7,869	9,000+14%
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	6.48 TFLOPS+117%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+5%	1582 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	128+129%
L1 Cache	896 KB+17%	768 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+40%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Quadro P5000 (móvel)
TDP	75W-25%	100W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	104.9+17%	90.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 94% less ($2350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 3.6 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1366.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).