
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:

RTX A1000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 9,463).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 75W vs 60W.
RTX A1000 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅+20.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 75W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650
2019RTX A1000 Mobile
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅+20.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 75W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 9,463).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 75W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A1000 Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1650?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 136 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 211 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and RTX A1000 Mobile

GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile
The RTX A1000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 1140 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,463 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 9,463 — the RTX A1000 Mobile leads by 20.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the RTX A1000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.669 TFLOPS (RTX A1000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1140 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,869 | 9,463+20% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.984 TFLOPS | 4.669 TFLOPS+56% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+46% | 1140 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 56 | 64+14% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 2 MB+127% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (RTX A1000 Mobile) — the RTX A1000 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.2 (RTX A1000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A1000 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A1000 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 60W — a 22.2% difference. The RTX A1000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (RTX A1000 Mobile). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 60W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-40% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 104.9 | 157.7+50% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A1000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 | RTX A1000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | GA107 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #323 | #277 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













