GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla K80

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla K80 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla K80: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+46.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $4,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 4823.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $5,000 MSRP).
✅Tesla K80 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Tesla K80

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,363 vs 7,869).
❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3255.7% HIGHER MSRP
$5,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($5,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 46.7% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 5,363), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $4,851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $5,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 4823.7% (52.8 vs 1.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla K80 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Tesla K80

The Tesla K80 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2014. It features the Kepler 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 824 MHz. It has 2496 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,363 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Tesla K80's 5,363 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 46.7%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Tesla K80 uses Kepler 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,496 (Tesla K80). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla K80). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 824 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla K80
G3D Mark Score	7,869+47%	5,363
Architecture	Turing	Kepler 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	2496 ×2+179%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	4.113 TFLOPS ×2+38%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+102%	824 MHz
ROPs	32	48 ×2+50%
TMUs	56	208 ×2+271%
L1 Cache	896 KB+331%	208 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla K80 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla K80
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 128-bit on the Tesla K80. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K80) — the Tesla K80 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla K80
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Tesla K80's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Tesla K80). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla K80
TDP	75W-75%	300W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+486%	17.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Tesla K80 launched at $5000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 97% cheaper ($4851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 1.1 (Tesla K80) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 4700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla K80
MSRP	$149-97%	$5000
Performance per Dollar	52.8+4700%	1.1
Codename	TU117	GK210
Release	April 23 2019	November 17 2014
Ranking	#323	#419

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Tesla K80 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.