G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+12.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2162.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M60: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,002 vs 7,869).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1913.4% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Tesla M60

2015

Why buy it

✅+12.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $2,851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2162.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Tesla M60: it remains the more sensible modern option while Tesla M60 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,002 vs 7,869).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1913.4% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 better than Tesla M60?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,869 vs 7,002 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 1650 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (75W vs 300W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015, 12.4% more raw performance headroom, and a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That extra performance headroom should help it hold higher settings and newer game demands for longer.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce GTX 1650 is about $2,851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 MSRP versus $3,000 MSRP, and you are getting 12.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 2162.7%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Tesla M60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Tesla M60 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $3,000 MSRP, even if GeForce GTX 1650 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Tesla M60 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
1080p
low	94 FPS	104 FPS
medium	83 FPS	90 FPS
high	70 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	87 FPS	91 FPS
medium	74 FPS	80 FPS
high	60 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	29 FPS
medium	39 FPS	27 FPS
high	27 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	24 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Tesla M60

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
1080p
low	136 FPS	173 FPS
medium	113 FPS	136 FPS
high	94 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	84 FPS
1440p
low	79 FPS	125 FPS
medium	62 FPS	96 FPS
high	44 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	36 FPS	68 FPS
medium	27 FPS	52 FPS
high	21 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	32 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Tesla M60

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
1080p
low	323 FPS	315 FPS
medium	283 FPS	252 FPS
high	205 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	225 FPS	236 FPS
medium	202 FPS	189 FPS
high	151 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	130 FPS	158 FPS
medium	117 FPS	126 FPS
high	79 FPS	105 FPS
ultra	50 FPS	79 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Tesla M60

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
1080p
low	261 FPS	182 FPS
medium	211 FPS	148 FPS
high	191 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	166 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	132 FPS
medium	158 FPS	110 FPS
high	135 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	113 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	77 FPS
medium	74 FPS	60 FPS
high	65 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Open Tesla M60

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 and Tesla M60

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Tesla M60

The Tesla M60 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,002 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Tesla M60's 7,002 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 12.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Tesla M60 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,048 (Tesla M60). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 4.825 TFLOPS ×2 (Tesla M60). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
G3D Mark Score	7,869+12%	7,002
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	2048 ×2+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS ×2+62%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+41%	1178 MHz
ROPs	32	64 ×2+100%
TMUs	56	128 ×2+129%
L1 Cache	896 KB+17%	768 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Tesla M60) — the Tesla M60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Tesla M60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4+27%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M60). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Tesla M60).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 2.0 (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP6 (2x)
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Tesla M60's 300W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 350W (Tesla M60). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla M60
TDP	75W-75%	300W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	104.9+350%	23.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Tesla M60 launched at $3000. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 95% less ($2851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2.3 (Tesla M60) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2195.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).