G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla P4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla P4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $851 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 486.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Tesla P4 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 9,004).
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

Tesla P4

2016

Why buy it

✅+14.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
571.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla P4 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 14.4% in PassMark G3D (9,004 vs 7,869), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $851 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 486.5% (52.8 vs 9.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Tesla P4 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Tesla P4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Tesla P4

The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7,869 versus the Tesla P4's 9,004 — the Tesla P4 leads by 14.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 is built on Turing while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla P4
G3D Mark Score	7,869	9,004+14%
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	896	2560+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.984 TFLOPS	5.704 TFLOPS+91%
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+49%	1114 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	56	160+186%
L1 Cache	896 KB	960 KB+7%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla P4 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla P4
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 and 256-bit on the Tesla P4. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 2 MB (Tesla P4) — the Tesla P4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla P4
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla P4
DirectX	12	12.1
Vulkan	1.4	1.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla P4
Encoder	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 draws 75W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 0% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla P4
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-40%	500W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	53mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	104.9	120.1+14%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 came in at $149, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 was 85.1% cheaper ($851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) vs 9.0 (Tesla P4) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 486.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650	Tesla P4
MSRP	$149-85%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	52.8+487%	9.0
Codename	TU117	GP104
Release	April 23 2019	September 13 2016
Ranking	#323	#293

Search GeForce GTX 1650 on Amazon

Search Tesla P4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.