
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 26.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1060.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+26.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-26.1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $110 for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, it costs 45% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 45.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+45.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($110) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER leads by 26.1%. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692+26% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2560+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+77% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+3% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 88 | 160+82% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+49% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+75% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 36.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-31% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 400W-11% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 173mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5+82% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 45.5% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 115.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 45.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-8% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110 | $60-45% |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.4 | 167.7+45% |
| Codename | TU116 | GP104 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #207 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















