
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Why is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?
Comparing the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to the RTX 2060 shows the first real step into the RTX era. The RTX 2060 is approximately 15-20% faster in raw performance and introduces dedicated hardware for Ray Tracing and DLSS. While the 1660 SUPER is a legendary 1080p card for rasterization, it lacks the AI-driven upscaling features that have become essential for modern gaming.
The GTX 1660 SUPER remains an excellent budget choice for its simple efficiency and solid performance in eSports titles. However, the RTX 2060’s support for DLSS gives it much longer legs in modern AAA titles, allowing it to maintain playable frame rates where the 1660 SUPER might struggle. If you are building a budget rig today, the RTX 2060 is the winner for its superior feature set and more robust performance overhead.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $110), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1.9% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 11.2%. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 14,114+11% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1920+36% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 6.451 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+6% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 120+36% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 1.9 MB+36% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-22% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5+15% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 8.3% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 115.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-34% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-8% | $120 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.4 | 117.6+2% |
| Codename | TU116 | TU106 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #207 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















