
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 220W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅74.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌117.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.4 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌76% higher power demand at 220W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 74.7%. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 22,172+75% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 5888+318% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+304% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+3% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 184+109% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 5.8 MB+314% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 448 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 55.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-43% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5 | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER came in at $229, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER was 54.1% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 24.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-54% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.4+25% | 44.4 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA104 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #207 | #63 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














