
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 285W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅106.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌248.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌128% higher power demand at 285W vs 125W.
- ❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 40.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 285W, a 160W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 285mm, a 56mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅106.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌248.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌128% higher power demand at 285W vs 125W.
- ❌24.5% longer card at 285mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 148.8%. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 31,578+149% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 7680+445% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+697% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2610 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 88 | 240+173% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 7.5 MB+436% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 48 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 504 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 48 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 78% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-56% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-36% | 700W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5 | 110.8+9% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 71.3% less ($570 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 40.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-71% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.4+40% | 39.5 |
| Codename | TU116 | AD104 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #207 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












