
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Tesla T10

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

Tesla T10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Tesla T10
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is significantly newer (2019 vs 0). The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla T10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla T10 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $110 versus $975 for the Tesla T10, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 795.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+795.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($110) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($975) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and Tesla T10

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 and the Tesla T10 reaches 12,558 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the Tesla T10 uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 4,608 (Tesla T10). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692+1% | 12,558 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 4608+227% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 14.38 TFLOPS+186% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+14% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 288+227% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla T10 has 8 GB. The Tesla T10 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12.2 (Tesla T10). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the Tesla T10's 260W — a 70.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 500W (Tesla T10). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-52% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5+110% | 48.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP and currently averages $110, while the Tesla T10 launched at $2000 and now averages $975. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 88.7% less ($865 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 115.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12.9 (Tesla T10) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 794.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | Tesla T10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-89% | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $110-89% | $975 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.4+795% | 12.9 |
| Codename | TU116 | TU102 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #207 | #213 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















