CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) and GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,128 points. Launch price was $229.
GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 960 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,676 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) scores 10,128 versus the GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)'s 10,676 — the GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) leads by 5.4%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.884 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 4.608 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,128 | 10,676+5% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1920+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.884 TFLOPS+6% | 4.608 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz+33% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 120+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.9 MB+27% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel). Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 336 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs NVENC 7.0 (GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)'s 115W — a 35.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-30% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.6+36% | 92.8 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) and GeForce RTX 2060 (móvel)
