
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M40 24GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M40 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M40 24GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel).
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla M40 24GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) and Tesla M40 24GB

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,128 points. Launch price was $229.

Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) scores 10,128 versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 10,641 — the Tesla M40 24GB leads by 5.1%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is built on Turing while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 4.884 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,128 | 10,641+5% |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 3072+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.884 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz+43% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 192+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+36% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) draws 80W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 103% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-68% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.6+197% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | TU116 | GM200 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #250 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















