
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 285W, a 205W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅102.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌256.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 80W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
2019GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 285W, a 205W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅102.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌256.3% higher power demand at 285W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 539 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 269 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 742 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 652 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 569 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 720 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 879 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 585 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 324 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,128 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) scores 10,128 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 211.8%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 4.884 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,128 | 31,578+212% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 7680+400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.884 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+721% |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | 2610 MHz+64% |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 96 | 240+150% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 7.5 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 48 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 504 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 48 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 112.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-72% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.6+14% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | TU116 | AD104 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #250 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











