G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 165W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅61.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌230% higher power demand at 165W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

2020

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 165W, a 115W reduction.

Why buy it

✅61.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌230% higher power demand at 165W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)?

Yes. Radeon RX 7600 is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon RX 7600 averages 61.3% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 16,581 vs 10,119 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7600 is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is a 2020 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, 63.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7600 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Radeon RX 7600 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $269 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 61.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 63.9% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if Radeon RX 7600 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	90 FPS	168 FPS
medium	81 FPS	149 FPS
high	67 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	84 FPS	140 FPS
medium	72 FPS	114 FPS
high	57 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	40 FPS	85 FPS
medium	37 FPS	72 FPS
high	25 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon RX 7600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	201 FPS	414 FPS
medium	177 FPS	349 FPS
high	141 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	142 FPS	241 FPS
medium	119 FPS	205 FPS
high	96 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	109 FPS
medium	73 FPS	91 FPS
high	58 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	57 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon RX 7600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	455 FPS	746 FPS
medium	364 FPS	597 FPS
high	286 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	341 FPS	560 FPS
medium	273 FPS	448 FPS
high	218 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	171 FPS	280 FPS
4K
low	222 FPS	373 FPS
medium	182 FPS	298 FPS
high	131 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	88 FPS	187 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon RX 7600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	388 FPS	604 FPS
medium	317 FPS	517 FPS
high	258 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	218 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	314 FPS	468 FPS
medium	255 FPS	397 FPS
high	191 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	152 FPS	293 FPS
medium	114 FPS	271 FPS
high	101 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	187 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)Open Radeon RX 7600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) and Radeon RX 7600

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.

Radeon RX 7600

The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) scores 10,119 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 63.9%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 2655 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
G3D Mark Score	10,119	16,581+64%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.041 TFLOPS	21.75 TFLOPS+615%
Boost Clock	1485 MHz	2655 MHz+79%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	8 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	288 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 107% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)	Radeon RX 7600
TDP	50W-70%	165W
Recommended PSU	500W-9%	550W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	202.4+101%	100.5