
GeForce GTX 480M
Popular choices:

Quadro K2000D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 480M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌96.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 51W.
Quadro K2000D
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 100W, a 49W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 480M
2010Quadro K2000D
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 100W, a 49W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌96.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 51W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 480M better than Quadro K2000D?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro K2000D make more sense than GeForce GTX 480M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 18 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480M and Quadro K2000D

GeForce GTX 480M
GeForce GTX 480M
The GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 25 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 425 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,653 points.

Quadro K2000D
Quadro K2000D
The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480M scores 1,653 and the Quadro K2000D reaches 1,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480M is built on Fermi while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 0.5984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,653+3% | 1,600 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 384+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5984 TFLOPS | 0.7327 TFLOPS+22% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+2100% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 480M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K2000D relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 256 KB (Quadro K2000D) — the GeForce GTX 480M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480M draws 100W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 64.9% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 51W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 202mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 80-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.5 | 31.4+90% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000D is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Codename | GF100 | GK107 |
| Release | May 25 2010 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #743 | #750 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













