
GeForce GTX 480M

Quadro K2000D
GeForce GTX 480M vs Quadro K2000D Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 480M vs Quadro K2000D FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 480M vs Quadro K2000D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 480M
2010Why buy it
- ✅116.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌96.1% higher power demand at 100W vs 51W.
Quadro K2000D
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 51W instead of 100W, a 49W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 480M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 480M vs Quadro K2000D Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 480M
The GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 25 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 425 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,653 points.

Quadro K2000D
The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480M scores 1,653 and the Quadro K2000D reaches 1,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480M is built on Fermi while the Quadro K2000D uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 384 (Quadro K2000D). Raw compute: 0.5984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,653+3% | 1,600 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 384+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5984 TFLOPS | 0.7327 TFLOPS+22% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+38% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+2100% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 480M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2000D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 480M and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000D. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 256 KB (Quadro K2000D) — the GeForce GTX 480M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480M) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480M draws 100W versus the Quadro K2000D's 51W — a 64.9% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 350W (Quadro K2000D). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 95°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 51W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 202mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | 80-16% |
| Perf/Watt | 16.5 | 31.4+90% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro K2000D (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro K2000D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Codename | GF100 | GK107 |
| Release | May 25 2010 | March 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #743 | #750 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















