
GeForce GTX 480M vs Quadro P400

GeForce GTX 480M
Popular choices:

Quadro P400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 480M is positioned at rank 199 and the Quadro P400 is on rank 143, so the Quadro P400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 480M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P400 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Quadro P400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 480M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 480M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480M and Quadro P400

GeForce GTX 480M
The GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 25 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 425 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,653 points.

Quadro P400
The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480M scores 1,653 and the Quadro P400 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480M is built on Fermi while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 0.5984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,653 | 1,659 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 352+38% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5984 TFLOPS | 0.641 TFLOPS+7% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+175% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+633% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 12_1 (Quadro P400). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480M) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P400). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480M draws 100W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 30W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.5 | 55.3+235% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P400 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $60 |
| Codename | GF100 | GP107 |
| Release | May 25 2010 | February 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #743 | #741 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















