
GeForce GTX 480M vs Radeon R9 M275X

GeForce GTX 480M
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M275X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 480M is positioned at rank 199 and the Radeon R9 M275X is on rank 460, so the GeForce GTX 480M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 480M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 480M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M275X.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 480M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 480M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 480M and Radeon R9 M275X

GeForce GTX 480M
The GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 25 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 425 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,653 points.

Radeon R9 M275X
The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 480M scores 1,653 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 480M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 0.5984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,653+1% | 1,631 |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 640+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5984 TFLOPS | 1.184 TFLOPS+98% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+10% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+340% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 480M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X has 512 MB. The GeForce GTX 480M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X) — the GeForce GTX 480M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 480M draws 100W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 480M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 75W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 95°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 16.5 | 21.7+32% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M275X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 480M | Radeon R9 M275X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $300 |
| Codename | GF100 | Venus |
| Release | May 25 2010 | January 28 2014 |
| Ranking | #743 | #746 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















