
FirePro W600
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 480M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W600
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 480M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
FirePro W600
2012GeForce GTX 480M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W600 better than GeForce GTX 480M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 480M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W600 and GeForce GTX 480M

FirePro W600
FirePro W600
The FirePro W600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,695 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 480M
GeForce GTX 480M
The GeForce GTX 480M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 25 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 425 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,653 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W600 scores 1,695 and the GeForce GTX 480M reaches 1,653 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W600 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 480M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (FirePro W600) vs 352 (GeForce GTX 480M). Raw compute: 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro W600) vs 0.5984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480M).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,695+3% | 1,653 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+45% | 352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.768 TFLOPS+28% | 0.5984 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 44+38% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 704 KB+450% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 480M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The FirePro W600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro W600) vs 512 KB (GeForce GTX 480M) — the GeForce GTX 480M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W600) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 2.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 6+200% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W600) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480M). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro W600) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480M).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W600 draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 480M's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro W600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W600) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 480M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 95°C.
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 22.6+37% | 16.5 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W600 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro W600 | GeForce GTX 480M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | Cape Verde | GF100 |
| Release | June 13 2012 | May 25 2010 |
| Ranking | #732 | #743 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













